The investment that suits you best

This document was developed as part of present another hierarchy model, although this document discusses finance, we will make an opening discuss “strategies” variety which can be used as solutions with the hierarchy model, and this in different areas, not just finance.

Finally, addressing the “strategic” hierarchical model, you see how it helps in decision-making. The complexity of the financial world will show how this model works in full capacity.

The model below is explained this way: in the center, that’s your position, not relative, but hierarchical; then is a distribution around you whose values are random, some will be larger and smaller one of which is you, all in access that is hierarchical.

We use the model above to get you in the context. If investors are interested only diversify its portfolio to eliminate the risk, this fails in most cases because this hierarchical model of universal distribution is too basic, requires little challenge in managing its portfolio, and this is very risky (see why). So it is not the value (high profitability for the investor or unprofitable in on time: represented by the color in the above model). Neither the order in which the events occur: the order of choice, preference (represented by the hierarchical aspect of the graph).

Here is the strategic hierarchical model, it is based on the “twinning”:

This new strategic hierarchical model based on twinning is the best in its class as portfolio management in the field of finance. And also serve as a model for various things. Twinning, seen by this model is characterized by a gradient that expresses when the limit is reached the twinning because as stated in the document “Healing of the routine” (Doc# HEA-0001-v1-EN), you have to see the limits. In this model, we have the center of the hierarchy that represents the top level twinning: dark pentagon. And we have the limit of twinning: white pentagon. The gradient that goes from dark to white means that investments in this area are best twin at nothing. All in a coherent whole.

In conclusion, this model is a work that opens many doors. But other documentation will demonstrate that this is the best model for chemistry, because in the mind that says “we must agree to become strong” (as stated in an upcoming book), which said it needs to be the pentaprism to express only 5 sides, these accords creating a form, whereas at 6, we remain neutral by not creating anything … so low. But this is just an argument to say that the 5 sides is better than 6 … because when we will start to develop documentation in chemistry, we direct us to the models 5 sides. The advantage on 5 sides is that the molecules do not touch each other.

We said that we show you how the strategic hierarchical model helps decision-making. Well, here.

First, a decision should not be taken with a brainstorming … the brainstorming is a list of ideas that has no order. And often those who make decisions on such models take risky decisions.

An idea, it’s working, and what is important is to combine the right ingredients. And even if you exclude items from a brainstorming list, excluding, you are paired to exclude them, and the decision turns the banality, because at bottom, the idea has not been worked out, it was picked from a list, and the decision is trivial since the decision becomes “picked an idea from a list.”

As in chemistry, a decision must be supported by a well multitude of suited twinning. Except that in the case of decisions, compared to chemistry, these are elements that require a lot more leadership.

Communism remains with the decision model in Figure 1, it is the position that makes the decision, not the leadership. This results in blocking the “strategy” in the decision-making. Even a private company that says that it is safe from the Figure 1 … this is wrong if it is not valiant. Most companies eliminate the “position”, and replace it with leadership, and US companies are very valiant hiring geniuses. Except it is not written in the CV or in the forehead that the person is a genius. Even traditional IQ tests are based on the model in Figure 1 because it is not determined that with which the person is familiar. The number of years of study does not mean that the person has more leadership than another because it is a framed and directed training, and not left to itself.

Communism has always tended to attack the genius, for example, communism countries continuously attack the United States and they would attack Canada if the “great kid” was there. Because that genius wants more freedom in his work, and wants to develop his own line of conduct while respecting others. Even in North American companies, geniuses are not always beloved because they are accused of having social difficulties “supposedly”. What makes in a “socialist” system the genius has no place, because he is accused of having social difficulties.

Genius, socially, has no difficulty except routine (like everyone else) that is cured in the document “Healing of the routine” (Doc# HEA-0001-v1-EN). If people have difficulty talking to genius, it’s not the fault of genius, it is because these people should contact the genius with more effort… This is okay if the genius made efforts to increase the expertise of business and government, then it is “just” give them more effort to communicate with them, and recognize the contribution of genius in society. Moreover, the socialist communism too tend to think “position” (as in Figure 1) in its friendly relations instead of thinking “twinning” and “strategy”.