The keys of physics

Generated by the unknown, the creation is a force that prosperous when completed to produce an item. It is important to see creation as a science that is generated by a force. From the outset, we must begin by suggesting that a force acts because we need to focus on any form that is hypothetical. The study of this form is established by guessing that on what it acts and how it acts especially.

To begin, suggesting that the force of creation must have a purpose. If this goal was set, it would be how? We could answer the question "why are we born into the world?" And "What is the purpose of our birth?" Obviously, these are difficult questions which are also subject to philosophy. But for which we address these questions is to find exactly the purpose of creation. First, the creation must have several goals that need to change to give rise to the creation of more sophisticated elements. What was the purpose of the creation in the beginning? Could it be that God was lonely, otherwise what would be the purpose that God is present? I'll answer, the creation was to create a space. Space is not only material, it is also the multidimensional aspect of knowledge which is also spatial.

Without object (material elements), the space is not deep, so there is no space. Space is probably what allows the force of creation arise. See the forces of nature as the forces that have a mission to exist, otherwise there is not any force without a mission (or goal). The mission is a form of non-material space that generates force. From the point of view of science, we classify the behavior of the forces of nature. The first classification is to give a purpose to something to help us understand it.

Creation point of view of science will always be a mystery in itself, but we can investigate to understand certain elements. As mentioned in previous research, the creation is based from ancient elements. This concept based theory of creation that is probably a memory as the first element useful for creation. Memory (ancient element) was used to form new elements such as storage structures.

At the stage of creation, where memories are scrambling, time itself is being created. Indeed, the concept of time does not exist without moving any elements whatsoever. The time has created partially with the memory.

Then say that the memory continues to exist at the same time as the time, then comes the time these two elements are isolated to form new primary forces. These primary forces in addition to the force of creation, which gives a trio of force and now there was enough to build diversity.

Indeed, with a trio, we do not create opposition, or repetition. The trio is a set of elements that constitute the diversity at the base as if a force is not used, we have the choice between two other forces. Here the choice is created. Which is the basis of all intelligences is that the choice exists. However, this intelligence is premature, there must be other factors that must exist for it has high intelligence. But we will not dwell on intelligence, only the science of creation, so stay with the example of the trio.

Over time, we have a synchronization, which is an important element of depth to create space. Firstly, time is continuous, so do not stop, which is a force that pushes the other forces (creation and memory) to continue. Continuity being the initiating element for the creative force, it is added to this force, and there we have a continuous creativity, so a force that will develop the rest of the elements of the universe. It goes without saying that this form of continuity is somehow deep into the creative force. Suddenly this depth increases with time (continuity) and what form an evolution in the creative force continuously.

Depth pushes the creative force to coordinate its from the point of origin. We stop here regarding this key on creation science. It is relatively more likely theory as the theory of the Big Bang, and it is more useful because this scenario (very rich) on the creation demonstrates that we can logically from few elements to form a large complex diversity.

Seen as adversaries, the elements are in turn anger. Looking more specifically, adversity exists, however it should not be seen as a fight. Adversity is a force that puts competing elements not for a place, but their position in the assembly of elements. Obviously, as we can see, adversity does not make a struggle for resources. The elements of nature have strengths, never weaknesses. It's adversity that gives the appearance of weakness.

Somehow, adversity also creates the difference, that allows elements to be customized with respect to each other. Adversity is a force that makes you strong, not giving weaknesses. This is explained by the fact that adversity requires the use of forces contained within elements. It is in principle which allows to create the engine element that activates the use of properties in the elements of nature. We can thus consider that all the elements use adversity.

Adversity is still invisible to the reader because it is necessary to understand that adversity is part of a function of the physics of elements. Among other things, it is understood that adversity is a form of behavior of the elements and not a rule of physics. So adversity differs of a rule by the fact that these are the elements that use the adversity, and is not imposed. Adversity is used freely.

In a general believe, adversity helps structure by position elements of physics. This creates a form of order. The order is the heart of adversity.

If the elements have adversaries, that puts their importance in their place. Although some phenomena discovered so far do not appear adversity because these phenomena are called reaction as belonging to a rule. But if we consider the order in the position of the elements, we understand that this is not the rule, since it is phenomenon is not absolute, it does not belong to this context. For example, in the case of many chemical formulas used.

The role of adversity is very interesting to understand. More elements using adversity, their position becomes more just, but not absolutely, thus becoming more just, it allows to create openings in their position, and that is what we will call the phenomenon of diversification of elements. This is the heart of the purpose of adversity, to create unique positions, create unlimited diversity with a limited number of elements.

The revolution is probably slightly revealing the meaning of this word. But we must use it on a much larger theorem than the simple definition of this word. Physics is as it should be, with great vision on the environment. Thus, the revolution here is somehow not only the meaning of a turn around a point, but also a bearer of change.

If only enough to stop the general definition of enchantment, it would be a twist of magic, but here in the keys of physics, enchantment happens to be the arrangement of the personality of the elements in physics. So this word is actually borrowed to give it a different meaning in this key.

First, personality is a form of enchantment if desired since it reveals an adaptation of elements is arranged in advance to cause all movement personified of the element. This means that we should subtract the rule to the elements and discover their personality may exist. The personality, aka enchantment, adds to elements assets.

In their enchantment, the elements are personified to produce pleasing results to nature. We assume that everything matches. Of course, you can say that if you put your hand in the fire, it will not be pleasant. Except that the position of the elements account also as seen in the key of adversity (2^nd).

Which may discourage some in their concession for the environment is that all people do not also agree on what we should make as pleasant assets to nature. Obviously, it is not here that you should never use the elements and allow for them as they are, is that you choose to use these elements to make them reusable. This is known as being an ecologist, but more physicist than an ecologist. In regards to making a reusable component is a prerequisite for understanding how certain phenomena may coincide with these rules of work. First, it is not for us to isolate the phenomena as it is believed to do well in our research, it is rather better learn to create harmony, and then to use this understanding harmony on the phenomena that surround us: discover the enchantment of nature.

Stellar order should probably tell you that we will define in some way a part of the space system in which we live. We will not only define this system, but we perceive the real difference between the apparent operation and real operation. Here it is a question of correcting the vision we rely on reality, thus giving a more appropriate direction on the variables that we will use to define the actual operation.

First, addresses a topic that is often discussed, we are safe in the stellar system which we live, or we fear for our future? This issue is large and complex, as it is to bring the supports rather psychological than scientific, but at least we can open the door to further discussions on this topic. Specifically, we do not know much about how the system works, and why we care about this. But in reality we cannot say that the extinction of a species can be done by the destruction of part of its vital sphere. The security of our species is not really threatened by that moves around our planet. We need to think positively to the rules that were used in the manufacture of our planet. That said, first eliminate this potential destruction hypothesis and reflect on what leads us to see the embellishment on this system. Idem, rather it is in our survival instinct to want to prepare for the worst, even the myths that occupy our thoughts!

Fortunately, the order of our stellar system is mature. That is immature, it is always species that benefit from evolution. In our stellar system, the order is somehow penchant for the truth about our wholeness, that is to say, we complement a structure, or simply navigate us by chance in this space? Here we must admit that one or the other gives a similar result in the sense that anything can go upside down as right side up, since the meaning classification or declassification of the order is the same when we speak of the stellar system.

This is explained by the fact that our order may be maturely stronger than other stellar systems as it can also be maturely back on other star systems. But the answer is similar to the accuracy that we manage space and other spaces are managed by others. So if we see our stellar system is back, we'll just worry about the fact that this system is designed in this measure and has a scientific significance. The meaning is that the settings are autobuilders regarding the variables that were used to build our stellar system and so we have to trust what is already well managed.

The order is mature according to the personality of each star. Maybe life does not exist everywhere, but at least we know it is likely that it is because we are in this part of life. But the order in which each stellar system is constituted, is a common order, so that our planet depends on our sun, and the sun depends on what constitutes the galaxy therefore depends on other star systems in our galaxy. We will focus on this dependance.

Dependence on other solar systems is the order itself of the stars stellar. The order is a word that should have more sense than simply tell if the result is good. The order is the arrangement of units (suns) that produce a galactic system. The study of this kind makes us guess that we cannot be alone. Even as to the level of atoms, there is no atom in an amount of one and they must not alone be used for something. As if you guess between man and woman life is much better coordinated, it is on this principle of coordinates that we must hope to live. As it is easy to get lost in what we do sometimes, it is better informed a person that coordinates with others. Thus stellar order makes us understand how it is unlikely that we arrived we coordinate and build something alone and it's the same rule for atoms, beings, life, planets, etc.

An electric circuit is the collection of electron donor source to the same target electron-withdrawing. The electricity is the current generated by the simultaneous difference of the source and the target. The electrical circuit is the set of elements connected to a positive and negative power supply, connected to the source and the target.

Firstly, the electron is seen (according to classical physics) as a particle being able to travel on conductive materials, which leads us to see the electron as a single entity traveling. In fact, we must see the electron as more stable than a mobile entity. The reason for this will be explained.

The electron has been assumed as the cause of electricity as part of the atom, and science believed that part of the atom is separated and then travel to other atoms and form the electric current. But here there is another hypothesis that the atom is indivisible. Although demonstrate by large forces of nature as with nuclear energy, the sun (high temperature), and more. Why atom must be indivisible? Because it supports the whole universe in the sense that the workings of the universe (planet, sun, galaxy) are connected by the material and if this Mathiaser was divisible, we could divide the universe; to avoid saying the word catastrophe.

The atom is not divisible nor any charge. This can be demonstrated that what we refer to when we talk electron comes from the magnetic field of a group of atoms formed to produce electricity. This magnetic field is probably the least studied because after the discovery of electricity, science has focused on the transfer of electrons rather than look at the behavior of the atom since the materials have classified by conductivity, rather than seeking to further understand the behavior of the atom. We obtained data on conductivity, but much less on the theoretical model of the atom which is similarly remained the same as previous years a long time ago.

The new trends are pushing science to want to undo what has been done as we can see from the many recent research on the electron (eg antiMathiaser). The science has not really progressed. True science is to complete the misunderstood and not from a galley of esoteric discovery that does not meet the initial work, want to keep the atom, rather than seeking to divide and destroy. You have to be stupid to build in reverse, safe building materials.

This is often the defeat of classical science who wants that we build with new materials. It is the greatest weakness, we must rather learn to do more with the same materials used different angles to achieve fulfill the destiny of the work of nature, that is to say more with less. Where the strength of scientific theories is measured, is that the one with less information progresses to larger prosperous areas.

How can nature grow by itself? Simply that it retains its key parameters and it advances its usefulness in nature by its own means. First, we need to know that there is not just a nice phrase to remember for the answer to this question. There will always be a mystery because we cannot unite all the elements that constitute the evolution of Mathiaser, but this change is real when it comes to see all the components that the nature is able to manage. Progress is definitely there.

According to classical science, the electron is detached from the atom. So now let's look at it from another angle. We say that the electron is the part that makes up almost the shape of the atom. Its round shape must be made of a shell to protect the heart of the atom. Every element in nature has a form of protection. In the case of the atom, electrons are its protection. We call electrons, electrified cells. As having the requisite protection, the atom is not looking for extra protection. For how can we call atomic energy if the atom is not sufficient elements to work.

Since the atom is sufficiency of electrified (electrons) cells, there is no chance he wants to give. So this is our science to find the solution to the fact that the atom in position sufficiency might want to transform anything. Consider then the reaction would be a layer of protection if she felt that the heart of the atom could be affected. And, yes, this is a protective measure that the atom reacts. We must keep the focus on his reaction when his safety is affected. The atom reacts probably full, he would react to a heat source, it would react with nuclear energy, etc.. So is the atom in its living form because it reacts against its environment. This is the progress of the atom in relation to the other atoms in its environment.

To get to correctly explain the behavior of the electric circuit in a cell, we will discuss the third dimension that is not yet perceived by scientists and is a discovery which the author of this document is able to perceive and to draw-made goods that third dimension. Firstly, I would like to discuss with you why scientists are unable to perceive this third dimension. Maybe I should have used a different name to the phenomenon of the third dimension that I will discuss with you, but it is obvious to explain this vision by using this term, because the third dimension supposedly known n 'is that the perception of depth. But now we will discuss what is actually the 3rd dimension and see it sets many things in science.

Figure 6 – The third dimension

The third dimension as shown in Figure 6 is an example of the third dimension. This figure shows that the space is recreated on a non-Cartesian space, that is to say, when we consider that space is taken, normally this space can not be resumed, but this is where the third dimension occurs, it recreates a space depending on where you happen to achieve it. This is called in part the 3rd dimension, but it is much broader than that as a concept.

Figure 7 – The third dimension (explanation of the recreated space)

The sphere above left shows a cloudy surface. What is important to consider is that each cloud (purple) does not use one or the other. Therefore, even in the center, the space is created without the cloud touch in one and another. This is what may be called the concept of space recreated.

The above-left sphere shows tubes with infinite length. The concept of space is recreated here to know that when the tubes reach the center, they do not touch, they are not forwarded either. The central space is recreated to allow the tube to pass through the center. Therefore, the center becomes larger, the central space is recreated.

First, the concept of the space recreated you was presented. Another concept of the third dimension is what contains. We could calculate the space, for example, but when we say that the space contains within an area, we cannot actually calculate. As to contain not calculated in this way, when we use an approach to enforce the full potential of something. Then so that something contains, but is not calculating, it explains that between 2 items, the space that is calculated always refers to a measure that is not calculated. This means that a measurement used to calculate, but the measure itself does not calculate, it contains.

Since we have to provide an example, Figure 8 shows a map which calculates the space, and another map which contains space relative to the position of objects. In Figure 8, the second level is used to indicate that there is another way to calculate with a unit of measure as the first map. This difference is important to consider. For electrified cell which we develop in this key, we absolutely understand what is contained instead of what is calculated. The key here is understanding in this aspect is that what we call an electric circuit is actually a network that is contained in a global cell, and not more electrons flying over the area. The concept of global cell comes unify the sense that we perceive electrical components. First, the electrons do not travel, but the electric cell reacts according to the use we make.

Figure 8 – Space which is calculated vs the space which is contained

Now that we have developed the concept of recreated space and the concept that "contains", we are ready to explain the behavior of electrified cell. When we say that the space is recreated, it is in the case of the cell electrified, a parallel circuit of an electric circuit. But the concept does not stop there. Parallelism is a space recreates the source and target of a circuit, which allows us to say that the source is also a parallel with the target. Having said that, without recreated space even a single circuit would not work. The target is in the source, and the source is in the target, so already united. What is already united is not separate and does not constitute a positive or a negative, so is not contrary but said positive and said negative is contained one in the other. Left with the idea that nothing separates or divides, stay with the idea that the elements are joined together.

Back to the top of the page